Aviators Accuse East Hampton Town Of Contempt As 'New' Airport Becomes Reality Despite Court Ruling - 27 East

Aviators Accuse East Hampton Town Of Contempt As 'New' Airport Becomes Reality Despite Court Ruling

icon 1 Photo
East Hampton Airport has remained open to all aircraft this past week as the legal battle over its status continued to rage between attorneys for the town and the plaintiffs in three lawsuits seeking to block the town from imposing restrictions on flights.

East Hampton Airport has remained open to all aircraft this past week as the legal battle over its status continued to rage between attorneys for the town and the plaintiffs in three lawsuits seeking to block the town from imposing restrictions on flights.

authorMichael Wright on May 25, 2022

East Hampton Airport has continued to operate largely as always this past week — but attorneys for East Hampton Town and the plaintiffs in three lawsuits seeking to block the town from imposing new restrictions on flights have traded blows and accusations through state courts daily.

One of the three groups of plaintiffs has asked the State Supreme Court to charge the town with contempt of court, saying town officials misrepresented the inevitability of certain technical aspects of the airport’s operations changing because of the planned shift to a private airport, which was blocked by a judge on May 16.

The town’s attorneys have argued the inability to pause the changes when a temporary restraining order was issued at the last minute was a function of the FAA’s processes, and out of the town’s hands. They have accused the plaintiffs in the case of creating a dangerous situation for pilots by using the courts to try and dictate aviation policy, simply to defend against modest limits being placed on aircraft traffic.

But the plaintiffs’ attorneys have countered that the town had not been forthcoming about the details of the FAA’s process months ago, when the plaintiffs filed and then withdrew an initial TRO request, which could have halted the town’s plans in time for the FAA to leave the airport’s systems unchanged while the legal wrangling was worked out.

“It is plain that the town has consistently made false representations to this court regarding the deactivating of HTO Airport,” attorney James Catterson, who represents East End Hangars Inc., one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuits, wrote to Justice Paul Baisley last week. “At no point during these contentious proceedings, with dozens of submissions, hundreds of exhibits, and oral argument before this court, did the town ever mention that temporary injunctive relief issued by this court would be effectively moot due to a deadline for the town to notify the FAA that the deactivation was not permitted by this court.”

Baisley declined to hold the town in contempt and also rejected a town request to modify the TRO he had issued. The town asked an appeals court to lift or modify the TRO but was rebuffed.

The two sides will appear in a Riverhead courtroom before Baisley again this Thursday, May 26, to argue the merits of the TRO.

Regardless of the legal crossfire, the 85-year-old East Hampton Airport, known by its call letters, HTO, in aviation circles, officially became known as JPX on the Federal Aviation Administration’s charts last Thursday morning. Attorneys for the town have been calling the “new” airport East Hampton Town Airport, though it’s not known whether that will be the official new name of the facility.

The change in designations had been planned as part of the town’s proposal to close the airport at midnight on May 17 and reopen it on May 19 as a technically new, private airport. The FAA had signed off on the move in April and told the town it could impose a “prior permission required,” or PPR, system of flight rules — though the FAA has never expressly weighed in on whether the actual limitations on flights proposed by the town comply with federal aviation law.

The town had planned to use the new designation of the airport as an avenue to imposing curfews, caps on the number of commercial flights per day and banning the largest private jets — all with an eye toward reducing the noise impacts on residents of the neighborhoods beneath flight paths to and from the airport.

The scheme faced a flurry of legal challenges. The first three lawsuits were filed back in February, when the town had originally proposed its temporary closure scheme. Earlier this month, two charter airplane pilots petitioned the FAA and the U.S. Department of Transportation to intervene and rule that the town’s restrictions violate federal law. And on May 14, a national aviation business organization filed a lawsuit in federal court asking a U.S. District Court judge to block the town’s plans.

Attorneys for the three sets of plaintiffs in the first lawsuits — the charter aircraft booking service Blade, a group of East Hampton airplane hangar owners, a group called the Coalition to Keep East Hampton Airport Open, and a collection of more than two dozen homeowners from neighborhoods surrounding other airfields in the region, primarily Montauk — had asked the court to impose a temporary restraining order back in February, when the town had originally planned to effect the closure, but withdrew the request when the town delayed the temporary closure until May. When the closure was again imminent, the plaintiffs renewed their request for a TRO blocking the move, and it was granted last Monday, May 16.

The town pledged to abide by the court ruling and issued new notices to aviators that the closure would not be going ahead as planned, but FAA officials announced the next day that there was no way to reverse technical changes had that had been set in motion with their flight guidance systems. Charts of flight lanes throughout the Northeast had already been modified to remove HTO as of May 18.

Flight guidance procedures published by the FAA with instructions on how to approach HTO and land in low visibility, had already been deleted and were set to be replaced by new procedures developed for JPX and controlled not by the FAA but by a private contractor working for the town.

Attorneys for the plaintiffs have said that regardless of the inevitability of the shift from HTO and JPX, the new systems are not a completely apples-to-apples change for pilots because the new flight guidance procedures for JPX are not published publicly by the FAA and accessible to anyone like they were for HTO.

Because the town has paid to have the new procedures developed for the PPR system, it has set up an application process to access them that requires pilots to submit an application that indemnifies the town and presents proof of insurance in order to receive access. The town has granted permission to more than 100 pilots and aviation companies, but the attorneys have argued that the system still violates the terms of the judge’s restraining order by effectively constraining access to the airport. They have demanded that the town immediately expedite any new requests for access to the procedures without any requirements of indemnification as long as the TRO is in place.

“Our positions are crystal clear — your clients should not be imposing higher fees than before to use this airport and they should not be imposing new onerous conditions, such as indemnification and proof of insurance covering the town, than before to use this airport and receive access to the special instrument procedures there,” attorney Randy Mastro, who represents Blade in the lawsuits, wrote in one exchange with the town’s attorneys.

Town attorneys have argued that they have taken all the steps they can to smooth the operation of the airport under its new requirements, while being somewhat hamstrung by legal necessities in the steps that had been taken to prepare for the expected transition to private operations. They have throughout cast the demands by the plaintiffs as legal nitpicking.

“Petitioners have, from the start, treated this litigation as a game to prevent the Town from regulating the airport in any manner that does not align with their preferences,” one of the town’s attorneys, Nicholas C. Rigano, wrote in one retort on Wednesday. “But this is not a game. Someone is going to get hurt.”

You May Also Like:

Federal Funding for Public Media Is Close to Becoming a Thing of the Past | 27Speaks Podcast

President Donald Trump issued an executive order on May 1 instructing the Corporation for Public ... 10 Jul 2025 by 27Speaks

Let's Make a Deal

Since his swearing-in in January 2023, U.S. Representative Nick LaLota hasn’t faced a series of votes that rivaled the recent domestic spending package, which he played a significant role in pushing through Congress and onto President Donald Trump’s desk. It gave him a notable win: He proudly says he delivered on his promise to 1st District voters that he would get a reprieve on the federal government’s cap on the state and local tax deduction, or SALT. Ultimately, that’s true, with an asterisk. But it’s fair for voters to ask: At what price? Did a single-minded focus on this goal ... 9 Jul 2025 by Editorial Board

Stony Brook Medicine, UnitedHealthcare Reach New 3-Year Deal To Maintain Coverage

Stony Brook Medicine and UnitedHealthcare have inked a new three-year contract that will maintain coverage of visits to Stony Brook Southampton Hospital and Meetinghouse Lane Medical physicians for those with UnitedHealthcare or Oxford insurance plans. The agreement was announced just a day before the expiration of a temporary extension of the previous agreements announced in June, when the state’s largest insurer began notifying its customers that Stony Brook’s hospitals and doctors would be out of network coverage soon. “There will be no interruption in coverage for any of our United/Oxford patients,” Stony Brook announced in a statement this week. “We ... by Michael Wright

Sag Harbor Preparing Next Phase of Sewer Line Extension Project

The Sag Harbor Village Board, in its first meeting of the new fiscal year, reaffirmed ... by Stephen J. Kotz

Push for Donations To Complete North Haven's Lovelady Park

The North Haven Village Parks and Trails Association, the nonprofit organization set up by the ... by Stephen J. Kotz

HCBL Stars Set to Battle ACBL’s Finest in Sag Harbor Showdown

The Hamptons Collegiate Baseball League will play its 12th All-Star Game this Saturday, July 12, ... by Drew Budd

The HCBL's Best Kept Secret: Its Announcers

On a sun-soaked evening at Sag Harbor’s Mashashimuet Park, amid the familiar ambient noises of ... by Drew Budd

Tom Rickenbach Celebrates 40 Years at Apple Bank in Sag Harbor

In the summer of 1985, Tom Rickenbach, a recent graduate of the University of Delaware, ... by Stephen J. Kotz

Has the Market Peaked for Older Pickleball Players?

Pickleball used to be referred to as the “geriatric Sun Belt sport.” Most of its ... 8 Jul 2025 by Scott Green

Sag Harbor Little League's 10U Baseball All-Stars Fall to North Shore in District 36 Playoffs

A 7-5 loss to the North Shore National Little League All-Stars eliminated the Sag Harbor ... by Drew Budd